Cultural Competency With The Palauan People - 1558 Words

Cultural Competency with the Palauan People Cultural Competence based on the Purnell Model can provide a comprehensive, systematic, and concise structure for learning and understanding the Palauan culture. Based on the previous paper regarding my Palauan friend, S.S., I will be discussing five areas where I can further improve my transcultural care pertaining to this specific community. These areas are in communications, high-risk health behaviors, nutrition, pregnancy and the childbearing practices, and death rituals (Purnell, 2014). Furthermore, I will present a reassessment of my culture competency to evaluate my learning that can positively affect the nursing care of individuals from diverse cultures represented by the Palauans. COMMUNICATIONS: S.S. does not maintain eye-contact well and often looks away during conversation. Direct eye contact may be considered offensive or aggressive in her culture. Because I do know that this is inherently Palauan, I do not need to maintain direct and sustained eye contact while conversi ng with her (Purnell, 2014). I will certainly keep in mind to greet a Palauan in a clinical setting whenever possible as it is rude not to. Another consideration is the issue of timeliness. Depending on the situation, punctuality is not necessarily valued. Lateness is not considered disrespectful to Palauans as they are event-oriented people. I will have to explain the importance of timeliness if required and be flexible instead with appointment times

Domestic Violence And Its Effects On Children - 1421 Words

Jasmin Garcia Susan Nusser ENG-151 5/3/16 Domestic Violence Domestic violence that affects children in elementary school are a good amount. Children are the primary one s who get more affected when domestic violence is going on in there homes. There are many signs a child can give you when they are suffering from a trauma or depression from domestic violence. Some children get affected differently some have trouble internalizing, others have fear and pressure, and others will try to solve the problem. When domestic violence is detected in a home, the children are most likely to have trauma or depression which changes their behavior. â€Å"Children exposed to trauma of domestic violence tend to experience difficulties with internalizing†¦show more content†¦Also they may start to feel pressured with simple things that go on in school, like doing class activities, partner work, they may also show impatience. â€Å"It can also be a place associated with fear and pressure, due to the fact that the problems at home ca n become aggravated in school, expressed in bullying or subjection to bullying or exclusion or because it becomes a site where conflicts between parents are played out† (Eriksson, Bruno and Nà ¤sman 81-91). Not all children react the same way when they suffer from domestic violence. Some may tend to be very aggressive and others may just be more to themselves and not talk as much or be more away from friends or peers. Children can also think that arguing and or hitting is a good thing, because they see it at home and think its right to do it at school. That’s another way you can detect when they are suffering domestic violence. Children are like sponges they observe everything someone does or says, or even sees, also at their age they get bribe very easy it can be with the simplest gesture. When kids see what s going on at home and see â€Å"daddy† doing something bad, they will say he s the bad guy but when â€Å"daddy† tries to fix things like for example, daddy was bad when he made mommy cry, but he bought her flowers so now he is good(Baker and Cunningham 199-207). When male parent are doing something

Movie Review Taken 3 Essay Example For Students

Movie Review Taken 3 Essay Taken 3, is the third installment of the Taken franchise. The lead actor is Liam Neeson, who plays Bryan Mills. The movie starts off with Brian and his ex-wife Lenore, played by Famke Janssen, attempting to begin a reconciliation. Lenore is currently in an unhappy marriage with Stuart St. John, played by Dougray Scott. Just moments into the film, Lenoir is murdered, and Brian is framed for her death. Brian immediately goes on the run, and the movie continues on, with Brian being hunted by detective Frank Dotzler, played by Forest Whitaker. Brian is on a mission to keep his daughter Kim mills, played by Maggie Grace, from also being harmed, and to find the real killers. Taken 3 is directed by Oliver Megaton, and produced by Luc Besson. In order to fully form an opinion on Taken 3, we need to evaluate some of the key factors of the film. It is important to understand the background of the franchise. We need to consider the casting, and director of the film. It is also important to review the action scenes, and finally the plot. The original taken, which first aired in 2008, was based on Brian Mills just retiring from the CIA to form a relationship with his estranged daughter Kim. Kim goes on a trip to Paris with a friend, and ends up being kidnapped to later be sold for human trafficking. Brian then travels to Paris to search for his daughter. Throughout the movie, Brian ends up killing almost an entire Albanian gang, in order to save his daughter. In 2012, taken 2 was released. Taken 2 takes place in Istanbul, where Lenore and Brian are taken hostage, by a father of one of the kidnappers, Brian killed while rescuing his daughter in the first installment. This time, it is Kim that rescues Bryan, and Lenore. The actors seem to have lost their interest in the franchise. While I believe that all of the main characters are excellent actors, none of them seem to be trying very hard to make the movie realistic. Liam Nessons age is beginning to show, and is less believable in the action scenes. Maggie Grace come across as being pushed to do the film. Although she hits her mark as Brian’s helpless daughter, she fails to display the emotion that one would expect in the event of your mother being murdered. Oscar winner, Forest Whitaker, is new to the Taken movies, and while I do consider him to be a great actor, he does not deliver to the extent that he is capable of. One of the worst parts of the whole film, is that fact that the actor that play’s Lenore’s husband has changed. In the original Taken, he was played by Zander Berkeley, while in the third installment, Stuart was played by Dougray Scott. The fact that the character of Stuart changed, from an older wealthy businessman, to a much younger criminal, makes the movie confusing and really unrealistic. The director, Oliver Megaton, missed the mark in a big way with this film. He doesnt have a single director or movie making excellence to his name. Oliver Megaton, had received horrible reviews for previous movies he has directed, such as Transporter 3, Columbiana, and even Taken 2. Why they brought him back is beyond me. The first installment was directed by Pierre Morel, and considering how much of a success that installment was, one would think that he would have been asked to return. Considering this is supposed to be an action movie, the actual action scenes in this film are seriously lacking. You have the scene shot on the highway, where the only good visual you have is a refrigeration cart rolling down the highway. .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 , .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .postImageUrl , .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 , .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:hover , .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:visited , .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:active { border:0!important; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:active , .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3 .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ucc4e43842dde1fb5c76aa18ad343bfe3:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The play script and the film The Crucible EssayThe only other real action scene, is at the end, in the apartment of the killers. This scene is also very short lived, and the camera switches angles so often that it is all pretty much a blur. The cinematography of the action scenes is not good. The camera never gets a good close up shot during the action scenes. The frames tend to change every second, so all you really see is a blur. This makes it hard to tell what is going on. The first installment of this franchise, was full of non-stop exciting action scenes, which this installment is seriously lacking. Quite frankly, Liam Nesson and Forest Whitaker are by far too good of actors for this. Finally, we get to the plot. If this was not part of the Taken franchise, and it was a movie all on its own, it would be good. The plot of the movie, just don’t seem to line up at all with the other Taken movies. In the previous movies, someone was actualy kidnapped, or being held hostage, and the whole movie was based on Brian tearing the town apart trying to rescue his family member. Previously that made for a great action movie. This installment, was not actually revolved around anyone being taken. It is more of Brian on a mission to clear his name. Towards the end you find out that Stuart was the one that had Lenore killed, and Brian framed, but it does not actually make sense if you are basing this movie off of the first two. The first two installments had no mention of Stuart being involved in anything illegal, nor being involved with the type of people this this movie has labeled as the bad guys. In reality, Taken 3 is a good movie. It’s just not what you would expect, being part of the Taken franchise. If you are hoping to love this movie just as much as you did the first, this might not happen. If your objective is to just see a good movie, and not invest too much time into the franchise, then this will be a good choice of movie for you. The third installment of the Taken franchise has very good actors and a good plot, just not what was expected. I do hope that this is the last Taken movie though, due to the fact that every installment is just getting worse. If they are to make another Taken movie, I would hope that they would go back to their original director, Pierre Morel. If he had directed this film, I do believe that it would have been much better. Bibliography: Anderson, Kyle. Taken 3. 7 January 2015. Entertainmentweekly.com. 14 March 2015. Goldberg, Matt. collider.com. January 9 2015. Taken 3 review. 2015 12 2015. Sachs, Ben. Chicagoreader.com. 7 January 2015. Taken 3. 14 March 2015.

Raphaels Portrait Leo X with Cardinals Guilio de Medici free essay sample

In Nelson Minnichs religious interpretation of Raphaels famous portrait of Pope Leo X, Minnich first begins with the very basics of the portrait; what is contained within its canvas and why it is there. From small clues such as these, he is able to lay the foundation for which theories and conclusions can be based. He first points out the location of the figures in the painting. Minnich believes that they are in a large room, seated before a green cloth on the wall, or cloth of honor. There is some speculation, however, as to exactly where this room is located. Several theorists, as well as he, believe that the location is a room in the Vatican, perhaps the library. He points out that there is reflection of a window in several objects in the portrait, allowing more narrowing down the location even further and debunking the library idea. We will write a custom essay sample on Raphaels Portrait Leo X with Cardinals Guilio de Medici or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page With the location not quite known, Minnich moves on to the color scheme. He points out that the painting is known for its use of red on the robes of the pope and cardinals, the furniture, and the table coverings. Red was considered a papal color, so this is not unusual in a papal portrait. What is unusual however, is the other two men accompanying the pope in the portrait who were painted in later. Minnich identifies these cardinals as Luigi deRossi, Leos first cousin, and Guilio deMedici, another of Leos cousins. Leo was extremely close with Luigi and this is shown by Luigis hands on Leos chair. Guilio was considered Leos right hand man, and is depicted as so in the portrait by being almost a part of Leos right arm. Minnich also points out that it is ironic that Guilio is depicted as a cardinal because his clerical status wasnt determined at the time. From here we move on to another important item in the portrait, the bell. This specific bell was made for Leo after his election and is a hand bell used for praying. Minnich explains that its presence is most likely to represent Christ in the portrait. Next to the bell is a magnifying glass which Minnich says is merely there to represent the popes nearsightedness. Leo would have needed the glass to read the next item on the table, his bible. The bible is obviously not an unlikely item, being that it is a portrait of a pope, but it is where the bible is opened to that is of importance; St. Johns Gospel. Minnich tells us that Leos first baptismal name was Giovanni, a name that came from this gospel. After inspecting the painting for obvious clues and symbols, Minnich is ready to discuss the possible reasons for the paintings existence. The first being the obvious, that it is merely a papal state portrait. He points out several reasons that this could be a wrong assumption. The painting was kept in Florence and not in Rome, like most papal portraits. It was much smaller than an average state portrait. And the most obvious objection was that there were three people present in the painting, which is highly unusual for a portrait. Minnich then suggests the possibility that Raphael was merely painting a family portrait. But then he quickly points out that no other of Leos relatives was involved. He also points out that the items involved, a bell, the bible, are not usually in state portraits. With the state portrait theory clearly discredited, Minnich tells readers of the theory that the painting is simply an occasional piece, saying that it was painted just to be displayed at the wedding of the Medici and Valois houses in lieu of the pope and his two relatives not being able to make the festivities. Minnich states that the clothing in the portrait clearly leads one to believe that the painting was done months before the wedding. The pope and his relatives would have to have known far in advance that they could not make the occasion and Luigi deRossi was actually recognized as being present the day of the wedding. He says that occasional pieces are not usually so planned out, but does however, mention that a lot would be explained had Raphael begun painting a portrait and then suddenly attempted to switch it into a wedding gift and add the two cardinals. Not fully committed to a purpose, Minnich takes a quick look at the eligious meaning behind the portrait. He mentions that Josephine Jungie has the most persuasive theory on the painting. She believes that the bible represents the stage of the Holy spirit, the bell represents the new age, and that Leo looking to the left represents his looking to the arrival of the new age, and thinking about his own appointment as an Angelican P astor who will lead the Church in the final age. Minnich points out that this is persuasive because Leo was attempting to take on the roles that an Angelican leader would, yet points out the Jungie failed to find reason for the two cardinals in the portrait.